<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Summarization on Aaron&#39;s Worthless Words</title>
    <link>https://8bd9e53a.aww-3cz.pages.dev/tags/summarization/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Summarization on Aaron&#39;s Worthless Words</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://8bd9e53a.aww-3cz.pages.dev/tags/summarization/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>ROUTE Notes - OSPF Filtering and Summarization</title>
      <link>https://8bd9e53a.aww-3cz.pages.dev/posts/2010/06/route-notes-ospf-filtering-and-summarization/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 20 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://8bd9e53a.aww-3cz.pages.dev/posts/2010/06/route-notes-ospf-filtering-and-summarization/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Feel free to correct all this stuff.  Additions are also welcome.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Study Questions&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;ul&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;How do I keep an area route from reaching a router in that area?&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;/ul&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;You don’t.  That defeats the whole purpose of having the topology database on every router.  If you filtered one route from a router, there’s no way that SPF could calculate routes correctly.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;ul&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Fine, then.  Where do I filter routes?&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;/ul&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;You filter routes on an ABR or ASBR.  Since routers only have the whole topology for their area, it’s safe to filter routes from another area or from a redistributed routing protocol.  On a more technical note, you’re filtering type-3 LSAs on an ABR and type-5 LSAs on an ASBR.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ROUTE Notes - Controlling Routes in EIGRP</title>
      <link>https://8bd9e53a.aww-3cz.pages.dev/posts/2010/06/route-notes-controlling-routes-in-eigr/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://8bd9e53a.aww-3cz.pages.dev/posts/2010/06/route-notes-controlling-routes-in-eigr/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Corrections welcome.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Study Questions&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;ul&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Why would you ever want to summarize routes?&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;/ul&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Summarizing routes minimizes the routes advertised to the network.  For example, instead of advertising 192.168.0.0/24, 192.168.1.0/24…192.168.n.0/24, a router can advertise a single route to 192.168.0.0/16.  Keeping routing tables small saves hardware resources, minimizes convergence times, helps avoid route flapping, and makes the routing table easier to read for humans.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;ul&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;When will an EIGRP router auto-summarize a route?&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;/ul&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;If a router has interfaces that that are in different classes of network (Class A, B, C), then that router will auto-summarize those routes up to the classful boundary.  For example, if you have a 10.0.0.1/24 and a 192.168.100.1/30, the router will advertise 10.0.0.0/8 and 192.168.100.0/24.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
